Parenting counselling for psychiatric patients, run by the hospital's own team
- A cluster-randomised bicentre trial in German psychiatric hospitals enrolled 252 patients treated for various serious mental illnesses and compared a 12-hour mentalization-based parenting counselling programme (MB-PC) with a psychoeducation workshop, both added to standard clinical care.
- MB-PC consisted of five individual sessions with video feedback, five group sessions on understanding and responding to the child's mental states, and two sessions of social counselling, all delivered by an interprofessional hospital team of non-psychotherapists.
- Right after the programme, parents in the MB-PC arm reported better parenting practices on the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire total score: effect size 0.43, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.73, p = 0.004.
- At the 3-month follow-up the group difference was smaller (effect size 0.25, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.53, p = 0.085); all secondary outcomes, including parental stress, child abuse potential and child emotional well-being, favoured MB-PC.
When a parent is admitted to a psychiatric hospital, the chart usually notes whether there are children at home, and the conversation often ends there. A group from Heidelberg University and Charité in Berlin used the hospital stay itself to work on parenting.
Video, groups and a team without psychotherapists
Mentalization-based parenting counselling (MB-PC) adds 12 hours to standard treatment. Five individual sessions use video feedback, five group sessions guide parents to understand their child's mental states and respond to them, and two sessions cover social counselling. The whole programme is delivered by the hospital's interprofessional team, none of whom are psychotherapists. The comparison arm received standard care plus a psychoeducation workshop.
The trial in German hospitals
The cluster-randomised, open-label bicentre trial, with partially blinded observers, included 252 patients treated for various serious mental illnesses. The primary outcome was the total score of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire. Immediately after the programme, parents in the MB-PC arm reported better parenting practices: effect size 0.43, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.73, p = 0.004. Three months later the difference between groups was smaller, 0.25, with a 95% CI of -0.04 to 0.53 and p = 0.085. The abstract states that all secondary outcomes favoured MB-PC, among them parental stress, child abuse potential and the child's emotional well-being.
Using the weeks in hospital
My reading is that this trial moves the point of entry. Work against the cycle of abuse usually begins in the child's world, through child services, a paediatrician or a school, and often after harm has been noticed. Here it begins where the parent already is, during weeks of daily contact with staff. For the family, an admission is a rupture. Here it also becomes the time when a parent practises reading what the child feels.
For a psychologist in a psychiatric hospital, a first step is to ask every admitted parent about their children and about contact during the stay, and to treat the answer as the start of a plan.
The programme was delivered by an interprofessional hospital team of non-psychotherapists, during the time the parent was already in psychiatric treatment.
The trial was open-label, and the primary outcome was reported by the parents themselves. At 3 months the group difference was smaller and its confidence interval included zero. This note is based on the published abstract; the full text is behind a paywall.
- parents with mental illness
- mentalization
- parenting intervention
- child maltreatment prevention
- psychiatric hospital care